场景 072 · Codex Use Case

审计平行班课程一致性

对照各班大纲、日程、作业、政策和 LMS,形成带证据、优先级和负责人的一致性审计。

DataKnowledge Work
Audit course section consistencyDataKnowledge Work

原文核对:2026-10-13 · 中文正文 · 英文提示词与演示

场景定位

对照各班大纲、日程、作业、政策和 LMS,形成带证据、优先级和负责人的一致性审计。

难度
中级
时间跨度
1 小时

适合用于

  • 共享目标或要求的多班课程。
  • 检查面向学生冲突的院系。
  • 需区分统一要求与教师自主选择的审计。

相关工具

Google Drive

收集大纲、作业、日程和院系指导。

Spreadsheets

建立带证据、优先级和负责人的跨班比较。

起步提示词

英文原文 · 可复制后按实际材料修改

Compare the syllabi, assignments, schedules, LMS exports, course outcomes, department guidance, and instructor notes for these sections.

Create a consistency audit that:
- separates required alignment from instructor discretion
- flags student-facing conflicts
- cites the source for every finding
- recommends a baseline checklist with owners
- ranks fixes by urgency and impact

Return a draft for faculty review and do not overwrite source materials.

建立共同基线

先收集共同成果、院系要求和统一政策,再加入各班大纲、日程、作业、评分权重、LMS 和教师说明。

区分必需项与教师可自主选择的部分。

执行比较

使用稳定维度:

  1. 学习成果与必修内容。
  2. 评分权重与评估预期。
  3. 期限、出勤和迟交政策。
  4. 作业说明和学生术语。
  5. LMS 可见性与导航。
  6. 正当的教师个性化选择。

每个冲突需有来源及学生影响说明。

与教师解决发现

确认差异是错误、获准变体还是待定政策问题。

确定后生成负责人清单与建议文案,相关教师批准后才修改原材料。

展开英文原文对照

Use ChatGPT to compare section syllabi, schedules, assignments, policies, LMS exports, and department guidance, then create an evidence-backed consistency audit with conflicts, priorities, and owners.

Establish the shared baseline

Start with the common course outcomes, department requirements, and any policies that apply to every section. Then add each section’s syllabus, schedule, assignments, grading weights, LMS guidance, and instructor notes.

Label required elements separately from areas where instructors may choose different approaches.

Run the comparison

Ask ChatGPT to compare the sections across a stable set of dimensions:

  1. Outcomes and required content.
  2. Grading weights and assessment expectations.
  3. Due-date, attendance, and late-work language.
  4. Assignment instructions and student-facing terminology.
  5. LMS visibility and navigation.
  6. Legitimate instructor-specific choices.

For every conflict, require a source reference and an explanation of the student impact.

Resolve findings with faculty

Review the audit with the section leads. Confirm whether each difference is an error, an approved variation, or an unresolved policy question.

Once decisions are made, ask ChatGPT for a baseline checklist with owners and proposed language. Update source materials only after the relevant instructors approve the changes.